| Citizens for Tax Justice , 202-626-3780 | October 5, 2001 |
Administration proposal to accelerate income tax cuts
would overwhelmingly benefit the wealthy
Click here to see this analysis in PDF format.
Facing growing public sentiment to delay or repeal future tax cuts to address our nation's
economic and budget problems, the Bush administration is pushing for just the opposite. It
wants to accelerate the scheduled 2006 reductions in the top income tax rates to 2002. If
adopted, the measure would reduce revenues by $120-150 billion over four years.
- Most of the new tax cuts would go to the richest one percent of all taxpayers, whose
average 2002 tax cut would exceed $16,000.
- Four-fifths of the tax cuts would go to the best-off ten percent.
- In contrast, for three out of four taxpayers, the administration's proposal would
provide exactly zero in tax reduction.
"The administration's attempt to use the current crisis as an excuse for further tax breaks for
the wealthy is economically indefensible and a slap in the face to ordinary, patriotic taxpayers
who are willing to sacrifice for the good of America,” said Citizens for Tax Justice director
Robert S. McIntyre.
"Almost everyone understands that our economy needs both short-term stimulus to boost
demand and long-term fiscal restraint to reduce current interest rates on mortgages and
business investments," McIntyre said. "Showering new tax breaks on the wealthy would be
ineffective as a demand stimulus, and would make our future fiscal problems even worse."
Accelerating the Bush income tax rate cuts to 2002 (Calendar 2002 effects at 2002 income levels) |
| Income Group |
Income Range |
Average Income |
Tax cuts ($-bill.) |
% with tax cut |
Average tax cuts* |
% of tax cut |
| Lowest 20% |
Less than $15,000 |
$ 9,600 |
$ — |
— |
$ — |
— |
| Second 20% |
$15,000–28,000 |
21,500 |
–0.0 |
0% |
–0 |
0.0% |
| Middle 20% |
$28,000–46,000 |
35,900 |
–0.3 |
14% |
–11 |
0.8% |
| Fourth 20% |
$46,000–75,000 |
58,800 |
–2.6 |
39% |
–98 |
6.6% |
| Next 15% |
$75,000–153,000 |
101,000 |
–8.8 |
82% |
–445 |
22.7% |
| Next 4% |
$153,000–384,000 |
217,000 |
–5.7 |
64% |
–1,075 |
14.6% |
| Top 1% |
$384,000 or more |
1,137,000 |
–21.4 |
69% |
–16,275 |
55.3% |
| ALL |
$ 60,500 |
$ –38.7 |
26% |
$ –292 |
100.0% |
| ADDENDUM |
| Bottom 60% |
Less than $46,000 |
$ 22,300 |
$ –0.3 |
5% |
$ –4 |
0.8% |
| Top 10% |
$108,000 or more |
263,000 |
–31.6 |
74% |
–2,403 |
81.6% |
Note: The proposal would accelerate to 2002 the income tax rate reductions scheduled to take effect in 2004 and 2006. As a result, in 2002 the top rate of 38.6 percent would drop to 35%, the 35% rate would drop to 33%, the 30% rate would go to 28% and the 27% rate would go to 25%. The 15% and 10% rates would not change. Minimum tax effects explain why a third of those in the top 5 percent get no tax cut. *This column shows the average tax cuts for all taxpayers in each group, including those with no tax cut. Source: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Tax Model Citizens for Tax Justice, Oct. 5, 2001 |
Back To Reports