Income Taxes on Working Families with Modest Incomes
Under Current Law & the George W. Bush Tax Plan
Citizens for Tax Justice, January 2000
Click here to see this analysis in PDF format. The current federal income tax system does not tax the earnings of low- and moderate-income working families with children. In fact, the vast majority of such families actually
enjoy "negative" income taxes. In other words, their earnings are higher after income
taxes than before income taxes. For example, a single mother with one child earning
$18,000 a year in wages before taxes makes $19,004 after federal income taxes.
Current Income Taxes on Working Families
Who Get the Earned-Income Tax Credit
Income Group
% of EITC Families
Average Income Tax Now
Less than $10,000
16.8%
$ –1,829
$10-20,000
41.9%
–2,343
$20-30,000
34.5%
–1,002
$30,000+
7.7%
–497
All EITC families
100.0%
$ –1,658
Of fiscal necessity, the income tax rebates enjoyed by low- and moderate-income working families are phased out above certain income levels. An unfortunate side effect is that some working families can face quite high "marginal" income tax rates over the phase-out range, even though their actual income taxes paid remain very low or negative. To illustrate:
These high "marginal" income tax rates worry some tax analysts.(1) In theory, a high marginal tax rate can discourage work effort in some cases by reducing the rewards for working versus goofing off. Of course, in theory a high marginal tax rate can also encourage more work effort in some cases, since it takes more work to make enough money to support one's family. In any event, here is an example of how high marginal tax rates can coexist with very low average tax rates under current law:
The following table and chart offer more illustrations of average and marginal tax rates on low- and moderate income single parents with one child under current law.
| Average & Marginal Income Tax Rates on Single Parents with One Child | ||||||||
| Pretax hours in year | Pay per hour pretax | Total earnings pretax | Federal income tax | Total earnings after tax | Average pay/hour after tax | Average income tax rate | Per hour after tax, last 11 hours worked | Marginal income tax rate |
| 1 | $9.00 | $ 9 | $ –3 | $ 12 | $12.06 | –34.0% | $12.06 | –34% |
| 744 | 9.00 | 6,700 | –2,278 | 8,978 | 12.06 | –34.0% | 12.06 | –34% |
| 756 | 9.00 | 6,800 | –2,312 | 9,112 | 12.06 | –34.0% | 12.06 | –34% |
| 767 | 9.00 | 6,900 | –2,312 | 9,212 | 12.02 | –33.5% | 9.00 | — |
| 1,384 | 9.00 | 12,460 | –2,312 | 14,772 | 10.67 | –18.6% | 9.00 | — |
| 1,396 | 9.00 | 12,560 | –2,296 | 14,856 | 10.65 | –18.3% | 7.56 | 16% |
| 1,687 | 9.00 | 15,183 | –1,877 | 17,060 | 10.11 | –12.4% | 7.56 | 16% |
| 1,698 | 9.00 | 15,283 | –1,846 | 17,129 | 10.09 | –12.1% | 6.21 | 31% |
| 2,000 | 9.00 | 18,000 | –1,004 | 19,004 | 9.50 | –5.6% | 6.21 | 31% |
| 2,011 | 9.00 | 18,100 | –973 | 19,073 | 9.48 | –5.4% | 6.21 | 31% |
| 2,360 | 9.00 | 21,243 | — | 21,243 | 9.00 | — | 6.21 | 31% |
| 2,992 | 9.00 | 26,930 | 1,762 | 25,168 | 8.41 | 6.5% | 6.21 | 31% |
| 3,003 | 9.00 | 27,030 | 1,777 | 25,253 | 8.41 | 6.6% | 7.65 | 15% |
| 3,333 | 9.00 | 30,000 | 2,223 | 27,778 | 8.33 | 7.4% | 7.65 | 15% |
| 3,344 | 9.00 | 30,100 | 2,238 | 27,863 | 8.33 | 7.4% | 7.65 | 15% |
| Note: Taxes include only federal income taxes. | ||||||||

George W. Bush's tax plan and working families: To justify the large federal tax cut he proposed in December 1999, Gov. George W. Bush emphasizes the positive effects that his plan will have in reducing marginal tax rates on low- and moderate-income working families:
"[B]ecause the benefit of the Earned Income Credit diminishes as a worker's income increases, a single mother with two children on the outskirts of poverty will lose half of any additional dollar she earns (taking into account social insurance taxes and state income taxes). The benefit of taking an extra training course or working an extra shift is cut in half by the government. . . . Lowering these barriers to the middle class is one of Governor Bush's top priorities."(2)
There is no doubt that the Bush tax plan would reduce marginal tax rates on some working families with children. Whether this can be considered one of the "top priorities" of the Bush tax plan is another question, however.
As is explained in more detail below, the Bush proposal would reduce marginal tax rates for about a fifth of the 13.9 million working families with children that now get the earned-income tax credit. These changes will help those families, but their effects should not be overstated. Bush's proposed tax cuts for working families with children who get the earned income tax credit total $2.6 billion a year (at 1999 levels). That equals only one percent of these families' incomes, and averages only $182 per family.
Put another way, the $2.6 billion in total tax cuts that Bush proposes for moderate-income working families with children is only 1½ percent of the total annual reduction in taxes that Bush proposes. In contrast, 62 percent of Bush's proposed tax cuts--a total of $105 billion a year--is targeted to the best off 12.7 million taxpayers.(3)
Detailed Analysis
Current Income Taxes on Moderate-Income Working Families
Under current law, federal income taxes on low- and moderate-income working families with children are very low. In fact, the vast majority of low- and moderate-income working families with children actually enjoy "negative" income taxes. For example,
Below these income levels, low- and moderate-income working families receive actual tax rebates, due to the refundable earned income tax credit. For example, couples and single parents with two children earning $20,000 get a tax rebate (a negative income tax) of $2,232. Overall, the average federal income tax rebate for working families with children earning less than $27,500 a year is $1,755. Most of the families receiving these rebates (two-thirds) are headed by single parents.

Marginal Tax Rate Issues:
Although actual income taxes are negative for most moderate-income working families, "marginal" income tax rates--the amount of tax paid or tax rebate lost on additional earnings--can occasionally be quite high. Marginal income tax rates can reach 36 percent for some moderate-income families with two children (and in rare cases for families with three or more children), and climb as high as 31 percent for some one-child families.
These high marginal income tax rates stem primarily from the phase-out rules for the earned-income tax credit. The EITC is a refundable tax credit worth as much as $3,820 to families with two or more children and up to $2,312 for families with one child. The credit is phased out, however, above $12,460 in earnings. Specifically:
The rest of the high marginal income tax rates on some moderate-income working families stems from the 15 percent tax bracket. The starting points for the 15 percent bracket vary by family size and type. For instance:
As noted, however, despite the high "marginal tax rates," actual income tax liabilities for moderate-income working families with children are very low, in fact, generally negative. But some analysts worry about the possible disincentive effects of the high marginal income tax rates that some of these families face. Indeed, counting Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes, the marginal rate on increased earnings can exceed 50 percent in some cases (counting both the employer and employee shares of the 15.3 percent total payroll tax).
The Bush Tax Plan
In part to try to address the potential disincentive effects of these high marginal tax rates on moderate-income working families, the Bush tax plan offers two proposals:
These two changes(4) would cut marginal tax rates on some EITC families by reducing or eliminating the ranges of income in which the 15 percent tax bracket overlaps with the 16 percent or 21 percent phase-out rates for the earned income tax credit. (The EITC phase-out rates and ranges themselves would be unaffected.)
As a result, the current 36 percent marginal tax rate that some two-child moderate-income working families face would be eliminated. Those families now in the 36 percent marginal rate would see their marginal rate drop to 21 percent (just the EITC phase-out rate). In addition, the range of income now subject to the 31 percent rate (some one-child families) would be substantially narrowed. Specifically:
| Marginal Tax Rate Reductions for EITC Families Under the Bush Tax Plan | |||||
| Married Couples | Single Parents | ||||
| 1 Kid | 2 Kids | 1 Kid | 2 Kids | 3 Kids | |
| EITC Phase-Out: | 16.0% | 21.1% | 16.0% | 21.1% | 21.1% |
| Starts | $ 12,460 | $ 12,460 | $ 12,460 | $ 12,460 | $ 12,460 |
| Ends | 26,930 | 30,600 | 26,930 | 30,600 | 30,600 |
| Income Tax before EITC Starts | |||||
| Current law rate of | 15% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 15% |
| Starts at | 18,785 | 24,867 | 15,183 | 21,267 | 24,130 |
| Bush plan rate of | 10% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 15% |
| Starts at | 25,450 | 35,533 | 21,850 | 31,267 | 40,683 |
| Overlaps: | |||||
| Current law: From: | $ 18,785 | $ 24,867 | $ 15,183 | $ 21,267 | $ 24,130 |
| To: | 26,930 | 30,600 | 26,930 | 30,600 | 30,600 |
| Width of Range: | 8,145 | 5,733 | 11,747 | 9,333 | 6,470 |
| Bush plan: From | $ 25,450 | no | $ 21,850 | no | $ 27,567 |
| To: | 26,930 | overlap | 26,930 | overlap | 30,600 |
| Width of Range: | 1,480 | none | 5,080 | none | 3,033 |
| Dollar Change in Overlap Range under Bush: | $ –6,665 | $ –5,733 | $ –6,667 | $ –9,333 | $ –3,437 |
| % of all EITC families of each type with marginal rate cuts under Bush (20.6% of all EITC families) | 32.2% | 17.9% | 23.3% | 23.3% | 8.3% |
| Note: income tax rates above the end of the EITC phase-out range are not shown. | |||||
For single parents with one child, the range of income subject to the 31 percent marginal tax rate, which is now from $15,183 to $26,930, would be narrowed to a range of $21,850 to $26,930.
The charts that follow illustrate the effects of the Bush proposals on marginal rates faced by moderate-income single parents.


Changes in actual income taxes under the Bush plan: The reductions in marginal tax rates proposed by Bush would also increase tax rebates (or reduce taxes paid) for some moderate-income working families with children. The following charts illustrate those effects on single parents:(5)


The Bush Bottom Line: Overall, the Bush proposal would reduce marginal tax rates for
| Effects of All Bush Tax Cuts on All Families With Children Who Get the EITC |
|||
| Income Group | Millions of EITC Families |
% of all EITC families |
Average Bush Tax Cut |
| Less than $10,000 | 2.3 | 16.8% | $ — |
| $10-20,000 | 5.8 | 41.9% | –47 |
| $20-30,000 | 4.8 | 34.5% | –355 |
| $30,000+ | 1.1 | 7.7% | –539 |
| All EITC families | 13.9 | 100.0% | $ –182 |
| Bush tax cuts (annual at 1999 levels) | |||
| Total amount | $ –172.1 billion | ||
| Amount to EITC families | –2.6 billion | ||
| Share to EITC families | 1.5% | ||
| Figures include effects of: new 10% tax bracket; doubling the per child tax credit to $1,000; a deduction for two-earned couples; and an above-the-line charitable deduction for non-itemizers. Income classifier includes income that is not part of AGI. |
|||
These changes will be helpful to the affected families, but their effects should not be overstated. The sum total of all of Bush's proposed tax cuts on working families with children who get the earned income tax credit is $2.6 billion a year (at 1999 levels),(6) equal to only one percent of these families' incomes, and averaging only $182 per family.
Put another way, that $2.6 billion in total tax cuts for moderate-income working families with children is only 1.5% of the total annual reduction in taxes that Bush has proposed. That compares to 62 percent of Bush's tax cuts--$105 billion a year--that is targeted to the best off 12.7 million taxpayers.
| Changes in Marginal Income Tax Rates on Moderate-Income Working Families with Children Under the Bush Tax Plan | |||||
| Married w/ 2 kids | Single parent w/ 2 kids | ||||
| Income | Current | Bush | Income | Current | Bush |
| 12,360 | — | — | 12,360 | — | — |
| 12,460 | 21.1% | 21.1% | 12,460 | 21.1% | 21.1% |
| 24,867 | 36.1% | 21.1% | 21,267 | 36.1% | 21.1% |
| 30,600 | 15.0% | — | 30,600 | 15.0% | — |
| 35,533 | 15.0% | 15.0% | 31,267 | 15.0% | 15.0% |
| Changes | Changes | ||||
| From | to | Rate cut | From | to | Rate cut |
| 24,867 | 35,533 | –15.0% | 21,267 | 31,267 | –15.0% |
| Married with one kid | Single parent with one kid | ||||
| Income | Current | Bush | Income | Current | Bush |
| 12,360 | — | — | 12,360 | — | — |
| 12,460 | 16.0% | 16.0% | 12,460 | 16.0% | 16.0% |
| 18,785 | 31.0% | 16.0% | 15,183 | 31.0% | 16.0% |
| 25,450 | 31.0% | 26.0% | 21,850 | 31.0% | 31.0% |
| 26,930 | 15.0% | 10.0% | 26,930 | 15.0% | 15.0% |
| 27,450 | 15.0% | 15.0% | |||
| Changes | Changes | ||||
| From | to | Rate cut | From | to | Rate cut |
| 18,785 | 25,450 | –15.0% | 15,183 | 21,850 | –15.0% |
| 25,450 | 27,450 | –5.0% | |||
| Income Taxes on Working Families With Children Who Get the EITC: Current Law & Bush Plan |
||||
| Income Group | % of EITC Families | Average Income Tax Now | Average Income Tax Bush | Average Bush Tax Cut |
| Less than $10,000 | 16.8% | $ –1,829 | $ –1,829 | $ — |
| $10-20,000 | 41.9% | –2,343 | –2,390 | –47 |
| $20-30,000 | 34.5% | –1,002 | –1,357 | –355 |
| $30,000+ | 7.7% | –497 | –1,036 | –539 |
| All EITC families | 100.0% | $ –1,658 | $ –1,840 | $ –182 |
| Bush figures include effects of: new 10% tax bracket; doubling the per child tax credit to $1,000; a deduction for two-earned couples; and an above-the-line charitable deduction for non-itemizers. Income classifier includes income that is not part of AGI. Source: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Tax Model. |
||||
Back To Reports1. Coupled with payroll taxes and state and local taxes, marginal tax rates can approach or exceed 50
percent. For example, in the case of the single mother with one child making $18,000, on an additional
$100 in earnings besides losing $31 in federal income tax rebate, the mother will have $7.65 taken out of
her paycheck for payroll taxes and will indirectly bear the burden of the $7.65 in payroll taxes that her
employer also pays. She may owe state and local income taxes on the additional $100 in earnings as well
(and will probably pay state sales taxes when she spends what's left). As a result, of the $100 in additional
gross pay, less than half will be available to improve this family's standard of living.
2. "Fact Sheet on Governor George W. Bush's Tax Plan," Dec. 1, 1999, p. 7.
3. For a detailed distributional analysis of the Bush tax plan, see. Citizens for Tax Justice, "Analysis Of
Presidential Candidate George W. Bush's Tax Plan,"Dec. 1, 1999 (www.ctj.org).
4. Two other provisions of the Bush tax plan would affect taxable income for many moderate-income
families. An above-the-line charitable deduction for non-itemizers and a two-earner deduction equal to 10%
of the earnings of the lower-earning spouse, up to a maximum deduction of $3,000. These provisions
would also have a modest effect on marginal tax rates, but they are not part of the analysis here.
5. The tax effects of the Bush plan shown in the two charts on this page include only the effects of the
new 10% tax bracket ($10,000 for single parents) and the doubling of the per child credit to $1,000. The
effects of the proposed above-the-line charitable deduction for non-itemizers are not included here.
6. This $2.6 million in total tax cuts for EITC families includes not only the provisions affecting marginal
rates discussed here, but also the proposed above-the-line charitable deduction for non-itemizers and the
two-earner deduction for couples. Source: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Tax Model.