How the Reagan Budget Deficits Became Today's Surpluses

Click here to see this analysis in PDF format.

In 1986, the federal government ran a budget deficit equal to a staggering 5.0% of the Gross Domestic Product. This year, fiscal 2001, the government is expected to run a surplus (including Social Security and Medicare) of 2.7% of the GDP. How did this astonishing turnaround occur? There are two primary reasons.

Which goes to show that cutting spending and raising revenues was the only logical and effective way to balance the budget. Old-fashioned, but obvious, one might say.

How the Reagan Deficits Became Today’s Surpluses
As Shares of the Gross Domestic Product, fiscal 1986 to 2001
  1986 2001 Change Percent change % of change from deficit to surplus
Revenues
Personal & corporate income taxes 9.3% 12.2% +2.9% +31% 37%
Non-income tax revenues 8.1% 8.2% +0.1% +1% 1%
Total revenues 17.5% 20.4% +3.0% +17% 38%
Spending programs
Defense spending 6.2% 2.9% –3.3% –53% 42%
Domestic appropriations 3.3% 3.1% –0.2% –6% 3%
Mandatory programs, net 9.4% 9.4% +0.0% +0% –0%
International programs 0.4% 0.2% –0.2% –48% 2%
Total spending programs 19.4% 15.7% –3.7% –19% 47%
Interest on the national debt 3.1% 2.0% –1.1% –36% 14%
Total outlays, including interest 22.5% 17.7% –4.8%    
Budget deficit (+) or surplus (–) 5.0%
(deficit)
–2.7%
(surplus)
–7.8% –154% 100%
Note: Income tax figures are net of the refundable earned-income tax credit. Mandatory spending figures are net of the refundable earned-income tax credit and unallocated offsetting receipts.
Source: Congressional Budget Office, Jan. 2001

Citizens for Tax Justice, March 2001