![]() |
Citizens for Tax Justice 1311 L Street, NW Washington, DC |
TUESDAY, Feb. 27, 2001 Contact: Bob McIntyre, 202/626-3780 |
Click here to see this analysis in PDF format.
The tax cut plan advocated by President George W. Bush would target most of its
benefits to the wealthiest taxpayers if fully enacted in 2001, according to an analysis of
the plan released today by Citizens for Tax Justice. (Previous CTJ analyses measured
the impact of the Bush plan at 1999 levels.) The analysis shows that more than sixty
percent of Bush's proposed tax cuts would go to the best-off 10 percent of Americans. According to the analysis: The income tax cuts under the Bush plan would affect different demographic
groups in substantially different ways, with larger average tax cuts going to married
couples filing jointly and to families with children. In particular: Tables detailing the results of the analysis follow.
Effects of George W. Bushs Tax Plan
(Annual effects when fully in place, at 2001 income levels. $-billions except averages)
Income Group
Income Range
Average Income
Income Tax Rates, Per-Child Credit, 2-Earner & Charitable
Estate Tax Repeal & Corporate Tax Breaks
TOTAL TAX CUT
Average Income Tax Cut Only
AVERAGE
TOTAL
% of Income Tax Cut Only
% OF TOTAL TAX CUT
Less than $15,000
$ 9,300
$ 1.2
$ 0.0
$ 1.2
$ 45
$ 47
1.0%
0.8%
Second 20%
$15,00027,000
20,600
5.4
0.1
5.5
208
212
4.6%
3.5%
Middle 20%
$27,00044,000
34,400
13.0
0.2
13.2
500
509
10.9%
8.4%
Fourth 20%
$44,00072,000
56,400
24.4
0.4
24.7
938
951
20.5%
15.7%
Next 15%
$72,000147,000
97,400
29.2
0.5
29.7
1,496
1,523
24.5%
18.9%
Next 4%
$147,000373,000
210,000
8.5
3.7
12.3
1,640
2,356
7.2%
7.8%
Top 1%
1,117,000
37.3
33.6
70.9
31.3%
45.0%
ALL
$ 57,800
$ 119.1
$ 38.5
$ 909
$ 1,203
ADDENDUM
Bottom 60%
$ 21,400
$ 19.6
$ 0.4
$ 20.0
$ 251
$ 256
16.5%
12.7%
Top 10%
$104,000 or more
256,000
57.5
37.5
95.0
4,417
7,300
48.3%
60.3%
Notes: 1. The Bush tax cuts would be fully in place in 2008. The table shows how the fully-effective tax cuts would affect taxpayers at 2001 income levels in 2001 dollars. 2. The Bush personal income tax changes shown above include the Bush plans substantial increase in the number of taxpayers subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). (As proposed, the Bush plan leaves the AMT tax rates at 26% and 28%, even as it reduces the 28% and 31% regular income tax rates to 25%.) The AMT offsets to the Bush tax cuts are almost entirely in the top fifth of the income scale. Specifically, increases in the AMT compared to current law would reduce the Bush income tax cuts by 22 percent in the Next 15% group ($72,000147,000), by 66 percent in the Next 4% group ($147,000373,000) and by 11 percent in the Top 1% group (more than $373,000).
Source: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Tax Model
Citizens for Tax Justice, February 2001
Bush income tax cut demographics at 2001 levels
(excludes effects of estate tax repeal & corporate tax breaks)
Type of taxpaying unit
$-bill Number (mill.) of
Median
Income Median Tax Cuts
% of all units
% of all taxpayers
% of tot. tax cut
Units
Taxpayers
Per unit
Per taxpayer
Married couples filing jointly
$ 87.5
56.1
112.2
$ 60,200
$ 1,095
$ 547
43%
60%
73%
Unmarried taxpayers
31.6
74.9
74.9
22,800
279
279
57%
40%
27%
Families with children
$ 61.5
45.7
73.7
45,600
1,114
690
35%
39%
52%
Couples & singles without children
57.5
85.4
113.5
30,000
294
221
65%
61%
48%
Elderly couples & singles
$ 12.9
23.4
34.7
29,800
150
101
18%
19%
11%
Non-elderly couples & singles
106.2
107.7
152.5
35,600
597
421
82%
81%
89%
25.6
17.1
34.1
63,900
898
449
13%
18%
21%
Single, non-elderly, no kids
17.1
40.2
40.2
23,200
283
283
31%
21%
14%
Single parents
7.0
16.1
16.1
22,600
326
326
12%
9%
6%
Totals
$ 119.1
131.1
187.2
$ 34,400
$ 500
$ 350
100%
100%
100%
Notes: Couples have two taxpayers; others have one taxpayer. All figures are at 2001 levels. Tax cuts are shown as fully effective. Taxpayers and taxpaying units include filers and non-filers. Median incomes are per taxpaying unit.
Source: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Tax Model.
Citizens for Tax Justice, February 2001
Back To Reports