Citizens for Tax Justice
1311 L Street, NW
Washington, DC
Friday, July 21, 2000
Contact: Bob McIntyre, Michael Ettlinger,
202/626-3780
Congress-Passed Marriage Penalty Plan "More of the Same"

Click here to see this analysis in PDF format.


Related CTJ Publications:
The marriage penalty tax cut legislation passed by both houses of Congress this week maintains the most striking characteristic of bills previously passed separately in each house--its benefits are skewed to higher income married couples. "Some details have changed but this legislation is just more of the same," said Michael Ettlinger, Tax Policy Director for Citizens for Tax Justice. A distributional analysis released by the group shows that if the bill's provisions were fully in place, 78 percent of the annual tax cuts would go to the best-off 20 percent of Americans. Over 20 percent of the benefits would go to the wealthiest five percent. The average tax cut for married couples in the top 20 percent would be $914, compared to a $157 tax cut for couples in the remaining 80 percent.

"If the surplus makes hundreds of billions of dollars of tax relief possible, we should give the tax breaks to those who need them the most," said Ettlinger. "Today the majority in Congress has continued its bombardment of the tax code with yet another salvo of tax cuts for the rich."

Effects of GOP Marriage Penalty Relief Bill
Income Group Income Range Average Income for all in group Avg. Cut for Married Couples in group % of Cut in Income Group
Lowest 20% Less than $13,600 $ 8,600 $ 21 0.3%
Second 20% $13,600–24,400 18,800 154 4.0%
Middle 20% $24,400–39,300 31,100 182 7.3%
Fourth 20% $39,300–64,900 50,700 171 10.7%
Next 15% $64,900–130,000 86,800 901 56.8%
Next 4% $130,000–319,000 183,000 960 17.0%
Top 1% $319,000 or more 915,000 910 4.0%
ALL   $ 50,800 $ 439 100.0%
ADDENDUM
Bottom 80% Less than $64,900 $ 27,291 $ 157 22%
Top 20% More than $64,900 $ 147,270 $ 914 78%
Figures show the effects of the bill fully phased in at 1999 income levels.
Source: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Tax Model, July 21, 2000.