![]() |
Citizens for Tax Justice 1311 L Street, NW Washington, DC |
Friday, July 21, 2000 Contact: Bob McIntyre, Michael Ettlinger, 202/626-3780 |
Click here to see this analysis in PDF format.
The marriage penalty tax cut legislation passed by both houses of Congress this week maintains
the most striking characteristic of bills previously passed separately in each house--its
benefits are skewed to higher income married couples. "Some details have changed
but this legislation is just more of the same," said Michael Ettlinger, Tax Policy Director
for Citizens for Tax Justice. A distributional analysis released by the group shows that if
the bill's provisions were fully in place, 78 percent of the annual tax cuts would go to
the best-off 20 percent of Americans. Over 20 percent of the benefits would go to the
wealthiest five percent. The average tax cut for married couples in the top 20 percent
would be $914, compared to a $157 tax cut for couples in the remaining 80 percent. Related CTJ Publications:
(PDF format only)
"If the surplus makes hundreds of billions of dollars of tax relief possible, we should give the tax breaks to those who need them the most," said Ettlinger. "Today the majority in Congress has continued its bombardment of the tax code with yet another salvo of tax cuts for the rich."
| Effects of GOP Marriage Penalty Relief Bill | ||||
| Income Group | Income Range | Average Income for all in group | Avg. Cut for Married Couples in group | % of Cut in Income Group |
| Lowest 20% | $ 8,600 | $ 21 | 0.3% | |
| Second 20% | $13,600–24,400 | 18,800 | 154 | 4.0% |
| Middle 20% | $24,400–39,300 | 31,100 | 182 | 7.3% |
| Fourth 20% | $39,300–64,900 | 50,700 | 171 | 10.7% |
| Next 15% | $64,900–130,000 | 86,800 | 901 | 56.8% |
| Next 4% | $130,000–319,000 | 183,000 | 960 | 17.0% |
| Top 1% | $319,000 or more | 915,000 | 910 | 4.0% |
| ALL | $ 50,800 | $ 439 | 100.0% | |
| ADDENDUM | ||||
| Bottom 80% | Less than $64,900 | $ 27,291 | $ 157 | 22% |
| Top 20% | More than $64,900 | $ 147,270 | $ 914 | 78% |
|
Figures show the effects of the bill fully phased in at 1999 income levels.
Source: Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy Tax Model, July 21, 2000. |
||||