|
What they are saying about corporate giveaways
HIP Health Care chief comments on
$10 million in Federal 9/11 resources received in exchange for moving 2,000
employees to Lower Manhattan:
While it was nice to receive the grants,
that was not a factor in our decision. -- Anthony Watson, HIP chief
executive, WNYC radio, October 12, 2004.
Pfizer executives explain why the city's
$46.1 million subsidy did not drive the company's decision to expand in NYC:
We never really talked about leaving Manhattan . . .
We realize
it's not the cheapest place to do business, but we're already here . . . We attract a high-quality workforce in New York City,
and we think it's advantageous to be in the country's business and financial
capital.
-- Greg Vahle,
Pfizer vice president of human resources and services, quoted in Crain's New
York Business June 23, 2003.
American Express says it would have stayed
downtown, even without a $25 million "retention" grant:
Our decision to return downtown, which has been
our home for more than 150 years, was not predicated on financial incentives
. . . Once those financial incentives became available, we chose to
participate, as did other companies.
-- Tony Mitchell, spokesman for American Express, on
receiving a $25 million grant to retain its workers in Lower Manhattan
following the September 11th attacks, quoted in Newsday June 3, 2002.
NYC mayor and US Secretary of the Treasury agree
that relying on tax breaks is bad business strategy:
Any company that makes a decision as to where
they are going to be based on the
tax rate is a company that won't be around very long...If you're down to
that incremental margin you don't have a business.
--
Michael Bloomberg, quoted in The New York Times, November 8, 2001.
As a businessman I never made an investment decision based on the tax
code... If you give money away I will take it, but good business people
don't do things because of inducements.
-- Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill
at his confirmation hearing in January 2001.
Subsidies: Now and Forever:
During the recession in the early 1990s, city
officials argued that the incentives were necessary to persuade corporations
not to abandon the city. Now, city officials argue that the city economy
is so robust that companies cannot find large blocks of prime office space and
cannot afford new construction without city subsidies.
-- Charles Bagli,
The New
York Times, Aug. 28, 1997.
Jersey City developers know
corporations are taking New York City for a
ride:
The city is paying an unnecessary
price in allowing itself to be shaken down by one tenant or another. Too many
politicians know the price of everything but not the value of New York City. I
don't know how Giuliani allows this rape of taxpayer dollars to continue.
-- Jersey City developer Leonard Stern, quoted in The New York Times, November
8, 1998.
A lot of people come out and kick
the tires and then go back to New York and negotiate a deal. It's part of
the process of getting subsidies out of New York.
-- Jersey City developer
Richard LeFrak, quoted in The New York Times, October 17, 1997.
Even some anti-tax groups have a
problem with giveaways to big companies:
It's a form of blackmail by the
companies and a clear case of corporate welfare by the politicians. The state
and the city could stop giving tax breaks, and companies would still want and
need to be located in New York City.
-- Brian Backstrom, Vice
President of
Change-NY, a conservative anti-tax group, quoted in The New York Times, June
6, 1999.
|
