As we mentioned last week, California enacted, as part of its budget compromise, a change in the rules determining what share of a corporation's income is taxable in the state. To be specific, California adopted an optional "single sales factor" apportionment formula, which multi-state corporations support -- because it will help them avoid taxes. Virginia appears to be following suit this week. Both of the state's legislative chambers have approved optional single sales factor apportionment, though only for manufacturers. The Governor has yet to sign the measure, and he has reportedly taken no position on the bill. You can read the ITEP Policy Brief explaining how single sales factor apportionment can reduce the fairness and adequacy of state corporate income taxes here.
Categories
-
Federal Tax Issues
- Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)
- Basic Needs (Education, Health, Housing, Income, Retirement)
- + Education
- + Health
- + Housing
- + Income and Work Supports
- + Retirement (Social Security, Retirement Savings, Etc.)
- Budget and Deficits
- Bush Tax Policies
- Economic Recovery
- Elections
- Energy and Environment
- Estate Tax
- Obama Tax Policies
- Regressive Tax Overhaul Proposals
- Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion and Tax Enforcement
- Tax Faireness and Tax Reform
- Tax Giveaways for Corporations
- Tax Giveaways for Investors (Capital Gains Breaks, Etc.)
-
State Tax Issues
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming


