Tax Justice Digest stories about West Virginia

Billionaire George Kaiser, head of Kaiser-Francis Oil Co., recently did something unusual for someone in his line of work. He told the truth about the subsidies that the oil and gas industry receives to the Oklahoma House Appropriations and Budget Committee. During his testimony, "Kaiser said he could "say unequivocally" that the tax subsidies in question have never influenced his companies' decisions to drill or restore any well in Oklahoma." Kaiser even joked, "In fact, I may lose my day job as a result of my testimony."

Kaiser focused his comments on the number of Oklahomans who could receive health care (125,000) and the raises that could be given to teachers ($1,300 each) if the state's priorities changed and the average $75 million in tax credits given to the energy industry over the last four years were put toward other priorities.

Business analysts know that if a company is making business decisions based on tax breaks, then the company isn't on very strong footing to begin with. But comments like these made by billionaire businessmen are quite helpful in cutting through the false claims made about taxes.
 
Speaking of ineffective subsidies, this week the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy released an interesting report Money for Nothing: Do Business Subsidies Create Jobs or Leave Workers in Dire Straights? The report details cases of private West Virginia companies cutting jobs even after receiving taxpayer funded subsidies. Accountability and transparency are necessary to ensure that policymakers and the public aren't funding incentives that ultimately do no real good for West Virginia. The author suggests concrete steps that can be taken to ensure both accountability and transparency, including accessible subsidy disclosure, publishing outcome data, enacting claw-back provisions, and the creation of a unified state development budget.

Gloom & Boom

|

States' collective fiscal outlook appears to be quite dim and could get even darker in the months ahead according to a report released this week by the National Conference of State Legislators (NCSL).  The report notes that, in the aggregate, states experienced a $40 billion budget gap for fiscal year 2009, a chasm that has been bridged largely through reductions in spending.

 

Not every state's budget is shrouded in gloom, however.  Some states derive significant revenue from severance taxes (taxes imposed on the extraction of natural resources like oil and natural gas) and have economies closely tied to these industries. These states, Louisiana, North Dakota, and Wyoming for example, are enjoying substantial budget surpluses. 

 

Given the volatility of energy markets, these surpluses are likely a temporary phenomenon, but that hasn't stopped states from considering and enacting tax cuts that would permanently reduce revenue.  Earlier this year, Louisiana briefly weighed the idea of repealing its income tax altogether, only to settle on an oh-so-modest annual cut of $300 million.  North Dakota has not only revived its property tax debate from a few years ago, but may also place on this November's ballot a measure that would slash the personal income tax by 50 percent and the corporate income tax by 15 percent.  In this context, a plan backed by West Virginia Republicans to completely exempt groceries from the state sales tax appears far more reasonable in scope - and would certainly help to improve the progressivity of the state's tax system.  However, it would still likely leave the Mountain State with inadequate revenues once oil and gas prices come back to earth.

 

Perhaps the most responsible - and fair - approach to surpluses generated by skyrocketing severance tax revenue comes from New Mexico, where Governor Bill Richardson this past week put forward a proposal to dedicate the majority of the state's projected $400 million surplus to one-time tax rebates and to highway construction.  Richardson's proposal does contain some permanent changes in tax law, such as an expansion of the state's working families tax credit, but they appear to be targeted towards those low- and moderate-income taxpayers who are facing the greatest challenges from the nationwide foreclosure crisis and from rising fuel and food prices.

All across the country property tax bills are coming due and outrage about the most unpopular tax is growing. Proposals for various types of property tax cuts, reforms, and relief abound.
 
In Michigan, legislators are proposing to limit property tax increases and make it easier for homeowners to appeal their assessments. In West Virginia lawmakers  want to freeze property taxes for seniors, and also limit property tax increases for younger homeowners. Politicians in Utah are considering a broad range of options including changing school district funding from reliance on property taxes to sales taxes and increasing their state's circuit breaker credit. Property taxes tend to be the tax that everybody loves to hate. The tax comes due in a lump sum, it's usually difficult to understand, and often it's not based on one's ability to pay.

Lawmakers in these three states and others should investigate property tax credits that ensure that low-income folks aren't burdened by the tax. While it may be popular with constituents to discuss property tax cuts, it's vital that replacement revenue be identified as well.
In many ways, Maryland's current debate over legalized gambling is depressingly familiar. Faced with a loophole-ridden and unfair tax system that cries out for progressive reform, some elected officials want to introduce thousands of slot machines as a politically palatable revenue-raising alternative. But Maryland offers an interesting, if bizarre, twist. Governor Martin O'Malley's administration is arguing that slot machines would make an excellent economic development tool for propping up the state's ailing horse-racing industry.
 
About the best one can say about the idea of providing tax subsidies for such a small and distinctly 19th-century industry is that it's less expensive than the more conventional smokestack-chasing other states continue to engage in. But Maryland isn't the first state that's had this idea -- and neighboring Delaware's experience has not exactly yielded dividends for that state's racing industry. And as an excellent Washington Post editorial explains, the environmental and economic policy goals the administration allegedly seeks to achieve with slots are a red herring.
 

The author of the O'Malley administration report that makes the economic development-based pitch for slots, Thomas Perez, claims that the introduction of slots in neighboring states has "revitalized the previously moribund horse racing industries in those states." Perez describes his report as "a fact finding tour of racetracks in Delaware, West Virginia and Pennsylvania." Perez's research techniques included counting the number of Maryland license plates in a West Virginia parking lot -- but his time might have been better spent just asking West Virginia's Racing Commission chairman, who sees "no correlation... inverse, in fact" between their 1994 introduction of slots at racetracks and the current health of that state's racing industry.

Other than both bordering on Pennsylvania, West Virginia and New York aren't generally seen as having too much in common — until this past week.  In agreeing to a budget for fiscal year 2008, policymakers in New York followed the lead of their counterparts in the Mountain State and incorporated combined reporting into their corporate income tax.

Combined reporting, as ITEP's February policy brief explains, is the "most effective approach to combating corporate tax avoidance" available to state lawmakers.  West Virginia enacted legislation to institute combined reporting last month and, with New York's more recent step forward, the number of states using this essential approach to corporate taxation climbs to twenty.  It could climb higher still by year's end, as North Carolina Governor Mike Easley, like the Governors of Massachusetts, Iowa, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, also now supports combined reporting. See this ITEP table to find out where your state stands on this important tax reform. 

Mixed News in the Mountain State

|

West Virginia appears poised to take a major step forward in combating tax avoidance by large and profitable businesses.  Legislation (SB 749) passed last weekend would institute mandatory combined reporting of corporate income beginning in 2009. Combined reporting is widely viewed as the best way to stop businesses from avoiding taxes by shifting income (on paper) from one state to another.  Governor Joe Manchin is expected to sign the measure into law.

SB 749 would make West Virginia the third state in four years to put combined reporting into practice, but this progress comes at a price. The same bill would also reduce West Virginia's business franchise tax rate from 0.55 percent to 0.20 percent over the next five years.  While combined reporting is expected to generate $33 million per year once fully implemented, the reduction in the business tax rate is anticipated to lose as much as $75 million annually.

For more on combined reporting in West Virginia, see West Virginia Citizen Action Group's recent policy issue brief.

Hot Topic: Severance Taxes

|
States that enjoy a large endowment of mineral resources usually levy a severance tax on the extraction of these resources and these taxes are receiving a lot of attention these days. In Colorado the Auditor's office found that many oil and gas companies may not be filing tax returns. Officials in West Virginia worry that coal severance taxes are on the decline there, while advocates in Arkansas say that now is the time for severance tax reform. For more on this, read the report "Digging Deeper," from Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families.

The highest court in West Virginia has rebuffed an attempt to further restrict the right of states to tax the profits of multi-state corporations.

As explained in a new ITEP paper, the U.S. Supreme Court has already restricted the ability of states to impose sales taxes on remote sales by out-of-state companies, and Congress passed a law back in 1959 that restricts states' ability to tax corporate income generated by remote sales of goods into a state. In West Virginia tax Commissioner v. MBNA America Bank, MBNA argued that their profits in West Virginia — its gross receipts in the state exceeded $10 million during one of the years in question — could not be taxed under the U.S. Constitution because MBNA had no physical presence in the state.

Fortunately, the court found that the amount of business MBNA has done in West Virginia amounts to "economic presence" in the state that benefits from the services provided by West Virginia — and that justifies the imposition of the state corporate income tax. Other state courts should follow West Virginia's lead in this area of jurisprudence.  

About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the West Virginia category.

Washington is the previous category.

Wisconsin is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.